Help us validate a problem we’re trying to solve.

We’re building DRCSync, a platform for tax and compliance teams managing global e-invoicing mandates. Before we build further, we want to pressure-test our read on the problem with practitioners who live it.

Five questions, ~90 seconds. We read every response.

Tax and compliance teams at multinationals spend six- and seven-figure annual fees with consultants to do one core thing: monitor every regulator they’re in scope for, detect when a schema or rule changes, and translate that change into action. The work is repetitive, expensive, and brittle. When France pushes a Factur-X update or Poland changes a KSeF field, the customer is dependent on a consultant noticing and explaining it.

How accurate is that problem statement, in your experience?

Spot on — this is exactly the painMostly right, but I'd refine itPartly right — there's a bigger problem you're missingOff the mark — this isn't the real pain

In your experience, who feels this pain most? (check all that apply)

Pick at least one.

How do most teams solve this today? (check all that apply)

Pay Big 4 / consultancy retainers to monitor regulatorsRely on their ERP vendor (SAP DRC, Oracle, etc.)Subscribe to specialist platforms (Sovos, Pagero, Avalara, Vertex)Manual monitoring by an in-house tax-tech teamThey don't — they react after something breaksOther (specify)

Pick at least one.

If a software platform detected regulator schema changes within hours of publication and surfaced the exact diff + impact, would your clients (or your own team) buy it?

Yes — clear pull, they'd pay enterprise pricingMaybe — depends on price, ERP fit, or integration storyProbably not — bundled into existing vendor relationshipsNo — wrong shape of solution for this buyer

What’s the single thing we’d need to get right for this to be a credible product to your clients?

0/500 · optional

Open to a 15-minute follow-up call?